After re-reading Reader 3 and the additional readings, I
actually found the ideas and concepts of networking and connectivity really
interesting.
Cooperation:
I think, in general, cooperation is vital. Axelrod started a
research about cooperating, wondering about the concept on a personal level and
on a business level. He made up a game, the Prisoner’s dilemma. When should one
be selfish? When should one cooperate? Those are the questions that formed the
starting point of Axelrod’s theory. He found out that the winning combination
was starting with cooperation and ending in imitation, ‘TIT FOR TAT’.
In a way, I feel like we should cooperate to fulfil personal
desires. Sometimes working together with people for a cause that is fair is the
best feeling.
In a business point of view, I’d say that’s when cooperation
really comes into play. Of course, being a business shark is going to bring you
a lot of money and that is no one’s secret, but at the end of the day, is it
money that we really want? Instead of making money on top of people’s back,
businesses should consider primary industries (farming). Ethical businesses are
starting to grow but it is still not enough.
Affiliation:
The idea of affiliation is something that I think affects me
generally in my life. It’s a hard one! First it needs to be balanced, so one
needs to be conscious of the amount of affiliation that one needs in order to
be content. That is already a hard job, and on top of all of that, one can also
be rejected by others (even though one feels like there is some affiliation
there). The idea of the ability to affiliate with people being genetic is quite
interesting. I can indeed relate to my parents and their relations to others in
the way I interact with people. Once one finds their perfect amount of
affiliation, it is full of positive outcomes as one starts to belong (share
views, opinions, being challenged by other’s point of views). Crisp and Turner,
in Essential Social Psychology (chap
11), mention that affiliation also depends on culture and countries. I find it really
interesting as I have lived in 3 different countries. I actually came to notice
that the way to affiliate with people was so different in each of those
countries. I, personally, take time to connect with people but when I am
finally affiliated to them, the outcome is usually a deep, rich and meaningful
friendship.
Social Constructionism:
This concept is almost disturbing nevertheless so
interesting. It makes sense somehow that all our knowledge is built from
interacting with other people and seeing the world as such. Michael Crotty’s Constructionism: The making of meaning is a really good read. It
really opens the possibilities of how to see the world. What I like is that it
makes you doubt about what you know and also makes you realise that each person
has a different ‘knowledge’ that is built on a different social background and
interactions.
Connectivism:
This concept goes hand in hand with the concept of Web 2.0.
Although Siemens’ Connectivism, A learning Theory for the Digital Age was
a challenging read, I appreciated his theory. I am not sure whether I agree
with it fully, I feel like the basic ways of learning (objectivism, pragmatism,
interpretivism) are still more valid. I
feel like Connectivism, although it makes knowledge accessible in a glimpse,
almost restricts the kind of knowledge that one receives. If one is now part of
an Internet community, then the knowledge acquired is usually just meant to be
accessed by one certain community (one’s vision of the world can become
narrow). To me, it somehow limits human interactions.
Communities of practice
As an aspiring choreographer, the Community of practice is a
major concept to me. If I want to put my own work on the stage it is not only
the choreography that matters, in fact it does not matter at all if this one
doesn’t fit with all the other departments involved. I made a list of all the
people that I would need to put on my on show, and the list is quite long. From
designer, to stage manager without forgetting lighting designer and producer …
everyone has a role to play and that is the beauty of art. I want to be a
bridge in between all these people creating beauty around my choreography. And
they are people with whom I need to share a similar vision of art and of the
particular show that I have in mind. It’s no easy task!
To sum up, I think networking is essential in every field,
especially in art. Reading more about affiliation and relationships made me
learn new ways of approaching the world. I cannot wait to use those principles
into directing my own show with my ‘Community of Practice’ (Although I still
dislike the word ‘community’). To me the
thing that makes great art is the mix of different art forms, because it is all
linked, there is no point in staying within our own artistic community. There
is actually not much difference between a dancer, a painter, a comedian … it is
all art. It is all people sharing their souls. The Canadian film director Xavier
Dolan uses that concept as well, he is the linking idea thread of everything.
He surrounds himself with a team of brilliant actors, designers, technicians,
producer …
Networking should only be positive and should not be used to
harm anyone. It’s a shame that all brilliant concepts can become our worst enemies
if not used properly.
Sources :
Axelrod, R. (1984) The evolution of
cooperation. London: Penguin. Serendip (2005) ‘Prisoner’s Dilemma’, Available
from:
http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/playground/pd.html.
Crisp, J & Turner, R. (2007)
Essential social psychology. London: Sage
Crotty. M. (2005) The foundations of
social research: meaning and perspectives in the research process, London:
Sage.
Siemens, G. (2004) Connectivism: A
Learning Theory for the Digital Age
http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm (Accessed 25 July 2012)